Evan Huck from User Evidence joins us to share the value of building scalable and relevant customer stories, and the challenges of making customer endorsements both authentic and impactful in a crowded market.
0:00
Thanks for tuning into this exclusive edition of GTM News Desk presented by the
0:04
TAC Network. This show is hosted by me, Nick Bennett, and my co-host, Mark Kill
0:08
ins.
0:09
Now let's get to the goods on with the show.
0:11
Our hi, we are back.
0:13
If you didn't listen to the first part of this conversation, Evan
0:16
absolute drops some serious knowledge as someone that was in customer marketing
0:21
as someone that values customers and has always talked to customers.
0:25
You have to listen to that.
0:27
But for those that are listening right now, we're going to be diving into Evan
0:30
's proven framework
0:31
when it comes to go to market with user evidence.
0:35
So Evan, what are your top three best practices when it comes to go to market
0:40
folks using customer
0:41
evidence in their marketing and sales strategies?
0:44
I'll share a recent example.
0:46
We did this report where we surveyed buyer sellers and marketers actually on
0:51
where there's this gap
0:52
in customer evidence. And the one thing I want to talk about is actually the
0:55
distribution of that.
0:56
So the report was great. We surveyed these three different audiences,
0:59
which was kind of cool to highlight the difference in opinions between buyers
1:04
and sellers and marketers.
1:05
For example, the sellers and marketers thought their website was the number one
1:09
source of information.
1:10
And buyers were like, "Nope, it's analysts review sites, customer stories."
1:14
So there's a bunch of examples like that. Another good one was marketers
1:17
thought that
1:18
fancy logos were the most important thing. And that was the very last thing
1:21
that mattered to buyers.
1:23
So this is going to be tactical guidance for folks that are thinking about
1:27
doing these kind of like
1:28
thought leadership, like survey based reports. Because I know we're going for
1:31
like media actual
1:32
advice here. So the two audience thing was cool. The comparing contrast,
1:36
obviously there's plenty
1:37
of interest, even just individually, there's lots of good stuff to talk about.
1:40
But having
1:41
additional opportunity to compare and contrast the two audiences, I thought
1:44
yield, it's a really
1:45
interesting insights. But the biggest thing I learned to this that I thought
1:49
was really clever
1:50
that our VP of marketing, Mark Huber did. So we had all the underlying survey
1:54
data that
1:54
informed the report. And then we pulled in basically influencers are like well
2:00
known
2:01
go-to-market experts to contribute their kind of thoughts and reactions. And
2:06
then we put those quotes
2:07
into their report, which made the report just a lot cooler and more interesting
2:11
. But the seeker
2:12
weapon and unlocked was we then had all these influencers as the distribution
2:17
channel to help
2:18
share the report when it went live. So you had like Devin Reed and people like
2:22
that that are
2:23
sharing it about way bigger audiences than that we do. And I think that like
2:27
when I'd done this before,
2:28
you know, last year, I'm just doing it through our own distribution network, we
2:32
generated like
2:32
45 leads or downloads on a similar report. And we were over 800 this time.
2:38
Obviously,
2:39
I got brands hopefully growing a little bit, but I think that influencer play
2:42
made a big
2:43
difference in enhancing amplifying the distribution of this report. And also
2:47
just adding
2:48
credibility because you have some knowledgeable known names kind of commenting
2:51
on the reports.
2:52
I love that. And funny enough, I have a book coming out in December that is all
2:58
about B2B brands,
2:59
how to leverage creators and influencers. And I talk about this specific play
3:04
because I've
3:05
done it on both sides. I've worked for B2B brands where I partner with creators
3:08
and influencers to
3:09
do something specific. And I saw similar results, which are fantastic. And then
3:14
as a creator myself,
3:16
I've also worked with brands to do similar and it's super interesting. So I'm
3:20
just more grateful
3:21
that you're even open. And I think obviously, I know Mark well, and I think
3:27
Mark does a fantastic
3:28
job with leveraging creators. He has a lot of amazing relationships, but it's a
3:32
fantastic play.
3:33
And I'm hopeful that more B2B brands start to go down that path too.
3:38
Yeah, it's super high leverage. I mean, I have like, and I remember my
3:41
marketing plan from the
3:42
game of the year, we had this abstract concept of like, we want to use influ
3:46
encers more. We didn't
3:47
know what that mean. And this was a good like tactical actual like usage of
3:51
that that I thought
3:52
made a big impact. Classic people for us go to market go to market tactic. It's
3:57
a great one.
3:58
It's a great one. We did similar things at drift, even hub spot. But I want to
4:03
go deep into how do
4:04
you build one of these thought leadership reports? How do you actually collect
4:08
the evidence to support
4:11
what you're saying in the report? This is interesting. And so my background
4:14
before
4:15
founding this company, User Evidence, I spent a long time at SurveyMonkey as
4:20
part of their
4:20
audience business, which was a market research based, you know, panel based
4:23
business. So for
4:24
this type of report, that's where it starts is like, you need to find an
4:28
audience, right? And
4:30
there's a couple ways to do that. And this is actually, ironically, our new
4:34
offering called
4:35
User Evidence Research Content is basically selling this, you know, methodology
4:39
. And there's
4:40
some technology behind it too on behalf of our clients to do reports like these
4:44
. But yeah,
4:45
this was the first one I've actually been involved in. So I learned a lot from
4:47
it. But from the
4:48
panel perspective, either you can build your own. So either, you know, you can
4:52
use your own
4:53
audience, which would be sending a survey out to your own LinkedIn or blasting
4:56
it out to your
4:57
email subscriber base or whatever. And that is one source. And then your other
5:01
source is third
5:02
party panel providers, which is kind of this ugly world of somewhat commod
5:08
itized, you know,
5:09
panel providers that all specialized in kind of different niches, right? Like
5:12
every monkey
5:13
audience was great for like B2C, if you wanted to get 18 to 21 year olds, you
5:17
know, opinion on which,
5:19
you know, Pamper's ads gonna be the most effective or something like that. But
5:22
you know, finding
5:23
comparatively scarce specialized P2B audience, like DevOps engineers or
5:28
something like that,
5:29
is a totally different scenario. So there's panel providers that specialized in
5:33
these kind of
5:33
different industry niches. And that's one thing that we're getting out is kind
5:37
of putting together
5:37
this network and make it easy to access. So you can find the right panel. But I
5:41
do like, on the panel,
5:43
that the lazy way to do it, which works is just go to panel provider, get your
5:48
responses and off
5:48
you go. I think there's a cool play to use both an external panel and owned
5:53
audience, because then
5:54
the survey collection piece can actually be a step in this campaign, like, Hey,
5:59
we want to hear
5:59
from you, Nick. And if you give us, you know, if you respond, you'll get early
6:03
access to the research.
6:04
And then the people that contribute to this report feel a little bit more
6:08
ownership of it, because
6:10
they've actually contributed to the data set versus just like seeing some
6:13
random data, and they never
6:14
were part of the study in the first place. So especially if you're, you know,
6:17
selling the same
6:17
audience that the study is going to come from. So ideally, you kind of synthes
6:21
ize both of these
6:22
data sources, own network and third party for random providers. The next step
6:26
is the questions.
6:28
And this was a learning experience for me. And I've been around surveys for
6:32
freaking 14 years.
6:33
So I have this hypothesis that like marketers think they're the shit on, you
6:37
know, generating
6:38
great content. But then if you go out of sales, people will be like, no, it
6:40
sucks. Like we have gaps
6:41
all over the place. And the way I friended the questions the first time, it
6:44
wasn't really the
6:46
case at all. I didn't support my hypothesis. I was like, Oh, shit, like, I got
6:49
to go back to
6:50
the well on this one. So I had to rejigger the questions, which is, you know,
6:55
it's a little
6:55
science on kind of, you know, leading the horse to water on what you want the
6:59
people to say.
7:00
And then the second time we did a much better validation of our overhead
7:04
offices. So that was one of the nice things about our offerings. We had an
7:07
opportunity to kind of
7:08
do a test sample to just like 30 responses to direction, see where it was going
7:13
. And then that
7:13
gave us time to change course before we had invested, you know, all this time
7:17
and money in the four
7:18
for it. So yeah, the questions, you know, obviously super critical hours of
7:21
extra conflases, because
7:22
we had to do it across three audiences so that we could normalize or compare on
7:26
some dimensions,
7:27
which was interesting. And then yeah, then a third report creation, you know,
7:30
analyzing and pulling
7:31
out the key themes, you know, hopefully molding it to your hypothesis and what
7:35
they want the
7:35
direction to say. And then you know, design, of course, and then the
7:38
distribution piece,
7:39
which we've already talked about is where I think a lot of the upside is to be
7:42
gained,
7:43
if you can, you know, nail the distribution.
7:45
I love this. It seems to me like we need to be doing a people first go to
7:49
market report,
7:50
Nick with Evan considering how aligned the go to market of both companies are
7:56
and how much we
7:56
believe in this, but we'll talk about that once you get back on surgery.
7:59
Absolutely. Yeah. I mean, trust me, I'm a huge believer of that. But you
8:05
dropped so much knowledge.
8:06
We have one more question for you because this is something, you know, Mark and
8:09
I,
8:09
we deal with a lot of different companies all over. And what's the one piece of
8:14
advice you'd
8:14
give to leadership who's looking to up their game around using customer
8:18
insights in their go to
8:19
market strategy at the end of the day? I think we get so caught up as leaders,
8:23
like I spend,
8:24
you know, all day, every day around user evidence and like, I just assume
8:28
people speak
8:29
language and like they know the value of it. And I'm always shocked on two
8:34
fronts. You know, one,
8:35
on the more constructive front, like when you hear feedback from actual
8:40
customers,
8:41
particularly at scale and you start to really synthesize the kind of the key
8:45
learnings of what
8:46
you could do better. I think that challenges a lot of your assumptions. Like we
8:49
've made
8:50
radically different product decisions this year. And I've been around the space
8:54
for a while that
8:54
we're not my initial instinct that like I wouldn't have made unless I had like
8:59
a good amount of
9:00
direct evidence from customers that supported the fact that they wanted this
9:03
different direction.
9:04
So it was humbling. And yeah, I think listening to customers is obviously cl
9:08
iche, but you know,
9:09
if you're presented with a lot of customers saying the same thing, you know, it
9:13
starts to feel a
9:14
little work and pilling. I think the second thing is more on the positive side
9:17
and kind of harnessing
9:18
these the voice of these customers for marketing purposes. Customers are way
9:23
better at selling
9:24
your product and way better at telling the story than you are. And that's not
9:29
to say that all
9:30
customers like a lot of customers are like, yeah, we love the product, which is
9:33
, you know, fine. But
9:35
when you do it at scale, like you will uncover these gems of people that just
9:39
write these like
9:40
novellas around them. But like the most interesting use cases and cool
9:43
applications and
9:44
fantastic results, but casting a wide net is what helps you get there, right?
9:49
Like some of the
9:50
gems we found just by just asking, you know, people on scale what they think,
9:54
yeah, produce some of
9:55
the coolest stories and content and evidence and proof points. And you can tell
9:59
like the marketing,
10:00
you know, written quote, like, yeah, this increased our efficiency and stuff
10:03
like that versus the
10:04
actual like real ones that have some depth and substance. And I think like in
10:07
this day and age,
10:09
there is such demand and hunger for like interesting, depthful, authentic, real
10:17
stories versus just
10:18
this kind of, you know, sanitized, polished, you know, presentation of one. And
10:22
so yeah, I think
10:23
that's a huge opportunity and piece of advice to find a way to unlock it doesn
10:27
't even have to be
10:28
completely positive. And in fact, I think that helps credibility. If there's
10:32
some more honesty
10:33
and what the tool didn't do well, because it just, yeah, get it, it builds,
10:37
yeah, much more
10:39
credibility in that particular, you know, reviewer 100%. I was gonna say that
10:43
was always
10:44
something that I did like people were like, why would anyone write a negative
10:47
anything about you?
10:48
And I was like, listen, I don't care what you write those negative comments. If
10:53
you want to see
10:53
it as negative, will help inform future roadmap to make the product better.
10:58
Like, think about it.
10:59
Like if you go around, say everything is the best, it's like, it's the best
11:02
product ever.
11:04
How are you going to innovate and make the product even better than it already
11:08
is? Like,
11:08
you need that as fuel. And I feel like companies sometimes like to like shy
11:12
away from that. But
11:13
that was something I don't know. I always loved hearing what is the other side
11:17
to use on how we
11:19
can get better. And people didn't hold back. Like, there was things that I didn
11:23
't even think of. And
11:23
I used the product, I was a previous user of the product before going like
11:26
working there. And I
11:27
was like, didn't even think of that. Like, that makes complete sense now that I
11:31
hear someone else
11:32
saying it. So yeah, I'm bored for sure. Well, one funny story is like, we
11:37
obviously like do
11:38
surveys with our product on our own product. And there's this one dude, he's
11:41
like a VP of product
11:42
marketing and one of the biggest like lead contact providers out there. And he
11:46
always writes,
11:46
like he writes, he's like epic. Like the coolest customer story ever. And he
11:50
always gives us a
11:51
six on the MPS. He's like, what? It's like, this is transformative. It's driven
11:55
so much value. And
11:56
like, MPS is six. I don't get it. But anyway, it's got a button. Yeah, I mean,
12:01
you need like the real
12:03
deal. We're actually helping a customer build a page that's all about why you
12:08
should not. Yeah,
12:09
either. I'm, I love that. I think that's, that's awesome. That transparency
12:14
first not being afraid
12:16
to disqualify. I think that's, you know, a great example about a built and
12:19
trust and credibility
12:20
really. Thank you so much, Evan. I'm going to hold you and Nick to it. We're
12:24
going to do a people
12:25
first go to market research report. It's been long overdue. Love the stuff you
12:29
're doing
12:29
a user evidence. Thank you so much for the time. Awesome place guys. Appreciate
12:33
it.
12:33
Thank you for joining us for this exclusive edition of GTM News Desk. If people
12:40
first content
12:40
like this is your jam, you should think about joining TAC Insider, our
12:44
community and resource hub
12:46
for GTM tech folks like you. You can find more info on our website at tacins
12:51
ider.com. And until next
12:53
time. Keep a people first, everybody.